Oh no! Riots on the street in Bristol as police crack down on small time protestors who are objecting to establishment profiteering [Tesco]...
and also ...
For those many people who follow this wonderful site & may not be aware of the facebook group which is called Robert Lenkiewicz 1941-2002 ... you may be interested to see that this topic is also being discussed there. The fb group is small by comparison with this one [less than 300 members] and has 11 administrators to date but, as Robert once said [but not about facebook groups] "all are welcome".
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=118408311571651&id=107170259311714¬if_t=share_reply
I note that Esther Dallaway has made a couple of posts there over the past few hours and has since taken them off which of course anyone can do with their own posts. So they are not available now for people to see. She made it clear that she was posting in her own capacity and not speaking on behalf of TLF but, broadly, she said that the Bristol exhibition was aiming to present Robert as a serious painter and had wanted to control, therefore, the type of material that was sold alongside it and that after long and careful thought she herself considered that Jojo's book was about other people's chatter about what their memories of Robert were and that this did not complement the view of the painter that they were wishing to project. Those are my own comments from recall of what Esther had written & if I've got them wrong, mea culpa.
Myself, I think that it's interesting that she posted & then deleted. I guess she felt an impulse to explain and then either herself or possibly after comment from others [I mean here, person to person comment, not online comment]... decided that it was better to stay silent. Never explain ... as the saying goes
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?NeverExplain
I think I agree with Sartre that it's a matter of merchandising and that definitely gives me a queasy feeling. It's interesting that Steve Fielding [from RWA] felt that he was "forced to agree" with TLF's position and that implies that TLF, or its Chair or whoever did the "forcing" has a position of some power. Would the RWA normally roll over onto their backs like puppy dogs and give in to a charity like TLF to the detriment of a small [sorry Jojo!] time author/publisher? Whatever the reasoning? Seems a bit like bullying ..
Of course this is TLF's [fantastic] project and they have shown that they can do whatever they like. I haven't seen the exhibition yet but I can already see that it is really excellent and they deserve great credit for that. Maybe it augers well for the future that they are controlling every aspect of presentation and are willing to en-"force" their own perspectives.
I know the Board members will read this ... so if folk have views about their censorship of Jojo's book ... please post here so that these views can be considered at the next Board meeting. Personally, I think it's a bit of a blemish on their record but they will carry on regardless! HOWEVER, it's good for power monkeys to hear their constituents. Another thing that Esther said was that that people could always put themselves forward to join the Board. Hmm... I should warn you that it's thankless and hard work!


Author



Logged
